Supervised vs. Unsupervised Learning for Intentional Process Model Discovery

0
96

Authors: Camille Salinesi, Charlotte Hug, Ghazaleh Khodabandelou

Tags: 2014, conceptual modeling, Rébecca Deneckère

Learning humans’ behavior from activity logs requires choosing an adequate machine learning technique regarding the situation at hand. This choice impacts significantly results reliability. In this paper, Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) are used to build intentional process models (Maps) from activity logs. Since HMMs parameters require to be learned, the main contribution of this paper is to compare supervised and unsupervised learning approaches of HMMs. After a theoretical comparison of both approaches, they are applied on two controlled experiments to compare the Maps thereby obtained. The results demonstrate using supervised learning leads to a poor performance because it imposes binding conditions in terms of data labeling, introduces inherent humans’ biases, provides unreliable results in the absence of ground truth, etc. Instead, unsupervised learning obtains efficient Maps with a higher performance and lower humans’ effort.

Read the full paper here: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-43745-2_15